Recreating my musical self with the aid of (community) gravity and other invisible forces

Comet Donati by Bond 1858

Image of the Comet Donati taken by W. C. Bond in 1858. The comet leaves its trail as it passes on its elliptical path through the solar system. Periodic activity can feel like long-period comets but perhaps not everything needs to follow such a long orbit.

I have had a somewhat unsettled relationship with making music for a long time. It has always been a passionate one, but it has often been difficult to the point of not being an active musician for many years at a time. I always seem to return though and I’m going through that process again now.

Perhaps because I’m a bit older and more self-reflective, if not wiser, I find myself watching this process as it is occurring and trying to make sense of it. When I was younger it didn’t need to make sense, it just happened, but perhaps I’m not as trusting or brave as I was then.

I have been prodded out of my comfortable isolated process by an interesting, intimate and introspective article by Clutch Daisy. Where’s Your Head At? looks at the effect of an increasing level of self-awareness in his creative process. (That’s my take on it anyway and I hope it’s at least partially accurate)

Clutch’s article has resonated with me because my current musical state is redolent with self-awareness. I haven’t made much music for ten years and the process of restarting is not an easy one in many ways. Simply justifying using the time is no simple thing as I could be spending that with my family or looking to fill it with more remunerative work.

In so many places heightened self-awareness inhibits action. Like a teenage boy in a new lumbering graceless body I’m contemplating the dance-floor and wondering how I’ll move. With my interrupted musical life it is simply a fact that needs to be dealt with though so I’m trying to incorporate the meta-process into the process somehow.

One profound difference between this iteration and those preceding is the development of technology. The most interesting thing to me is that it is not the technology associated directly with creating music that is having the biggest impact on me, but more generalised communication technology and social media.

The confluence of online communication, particularly through Twitter, and the rise of independent self-directed musicians publishing and distributing through the internet have given rise to communities of people being musicians together in a fascinating and powerful way.

As with so much social media use there are overlapping sets of people who for me form a web of musical activity that I am a, very, small part of. In the older world I think these groups would have been much harder to gain access to and would have had much harder edges to them. They would have been defined by geography and specific activity, serial composition, guitar music, electronic composers and so forth. Now it seems that there is a much broader conceptual grouping largely defined by being self-directed, articulate and clever at building online communities.

I am fortunate to have found this world and I gain a great deal from it. Broadly it is a sense of belonging and a particular kind of easy attachment with little or no expectation of contribution, either in terms of kind or frequency. Due to the large and overlapping nature of this group there is no central hub. There are people with more gravity but the whole is not dependent on any individual. For me this has been wonderful by allowing me to gently ease myself into a peripheral orbit where I can begin to spin my musical cocoon.

A crucial tool for me has also been two of the people I follow releasing stems of their music for remixing. This has given me a powerful kick to both make something and, probably much more importantly, to share it. Crowdsourcing, open licenses and using these remixes as a community building tool are new things made possible, or at least practical, by the internet and I am deeply grateful for them.

She Makes War — (Love) Like Liars (Just Remix) by rubken

Matt Stevens — Big Sky (Cirrostratus Remix) by rubken

Being able to build on something created by people I admire like She Makes War and Matt Stevens has drastically lowered the threshold I needed to get over to make music again. It takes some of the pressure off to know that there is a strong armature underneath whatever I make and there is a sense of purpose and participation that is very easy to access. It also helped me overcome my inertia knowing them through social networks.

These weren’t just songs they were songs by people I knew something about. It is easy to trivialise platforms like Twitter but many months of little glimpses into people’s lives, as moderated as those glimpses might be, show you much more than would be possible through the music and press release style communication in big sculpted clumps of information. In consequence I felt a kind of responsibility mixed with excitement as I hacked their music up and put it all back together.

I am aware that this process is ongoing and fragile. There is a long way to go, or at least I hope there is. This time around I’m hoping to make something out of the journey wherever it leads me. At least I have a solar system to reference my cometary orbit to. Gravity is not a strong force but it acts over great distance and being in it’s grip feels agreeable.

Posted in Making Music | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Capture the moment with direct to stereo recording

RCA 44-A ribbon microphone

A great microphone is just the beginning of making a great recording. You need to find the right configuration and placement and most importantly some great music to record.

I have written before about the benefits of recording direct to stereo and that post has proved popular so I wanted to go in to a bit more depth about how I decide if direct to stereo recording is suitable to use and what setup I might use in a couple of common situations. The main advantage of recording straight to a two-track setup is, as Joe Boyd points out in the comments to the previous post, that it tends to make the recording sound like events. It creates a feeling of integrity to the preserved moment.

Can the musicians perform the song together?

The crucial thing here is the moment to be preserved. With a direct to stereo recording you are capturing what is happening in the room, the live performance, so the quality of that is vital. There are some genres of music where this choice is easy, classical, jazz and folk all lend themselves to this approach as they are idioms based on performance. It can work well for rock/pop genres too. Indeed it can create a recording of great immediacy, but there is less scope for post-production. This is both the blessing and curse of direct to stereo recording.

Does the room sound OK?

This is the big decision for me. The musicians can all be monsters combining to make an amazing performance but if the room sounds horrible you’ll end up with an unpleasant recorded sound. If you have time to find the right room make the most of it. Try to get the musicians to come and play in a few rooms, use your ears and walk around the room listening for a sweet spot. It is worth bringing a step ladder along for this as the crucial point might be higher from the floor than your ears when you’re standing up.

The length and quality of the reverberation in the room are the prime consideration for me. The ideal varies depending on the type of music, a church with about two seconds of reverb time might work wonders for a choir but sound awful for that bebop quintet. You can get a pretty good impression of this by clapping your hands or shouting out short sounds and listening to the reverberations.

Do I have good mics for (at least) the stereo pair?

I like to use a stereo pair configuration as the primary recording source. It is always a good idea to use the best microphones you can and for this role quality makes a huge difference. Cost of the mics isn’t the ultimate judge of quality but you’re going to need more than a couple of SM57s for this kind of recording. I often use a M&S configuration with a cardioid and figure of eight but spaced omnis, A/B or X/Y can work just as well or better in different rooms. In general the A/B and X/Y configurations will focus on the sound in front of them more than M&S or spaced omnis. The choice depends on how the room sounds to you.

Do you need a bit more than the stereo pair?

Depending on the room and the musicians sometimes all you need is the stereo pair but in many situations you need a bit more control over the sound. This is usually best addressed with a few spot mics to allow you to balance the overall sound. The key to good results is almost always to keep your setup as simple as possible. Not every musician needs a spot mic and the fewer you can get away with the better.

This is very a very different kind of approach to the isolated source techniques that might be used in a typical rock band recording so the spot mics tend to be a moderate distance away from the player, perhaps even as much as three meters depending on the distance between the musicians. You are looking for a position that emphasises the source that needs a boost and perhaps most importantly you’re looking for a position that blends with the stereo pair. I would take a better blend with my main pair over better isolation in this situation every time.

Take the time to get a great sound from your mic setup

The quality of your recording is largely down to the mic setup in this situation. Take the time to get it right. Use your ears to find that sweet spot for the main stereo pair and check for any nasty anomalies the room might throw at you. The big baddie is phase and this is why a simple setup with fewer mics is much easier to wrangle.

One basic thing to look out for is make sure that your main mics are not equidistant from any walls and not in whole number proportions either (e.g. the distance from the front wall is two times the distance to the back wall). The variation in length of sound waves is massive from 1.7cm at 20kHz to 17m at 20Hz so beware of potential resonances. Your ears are the most important tool here. Listen carefully to what your mics are picking up and if you’re using spot mics use the phase shift button on your desk or preamp to see if it makes a difference. If it does you should try another position. If the problem is at high frequencies moving the mic less than a centimetre can have a big effect.

Set up your mix

The aim is that this isn’t just a monitor mix. This is the real thing. You’re asking the performers to nail it so why shouldn’t you have to get it right live too. Of course if you can recording the discrete channels is always a good idea too. Adding a touch of a spot mic into your stereo mix can be all that’s needed to save a great take.

Be gentle with spot mics. The stereo pair is the sound. The spot mics are there to augment that not to become apparent separate sources. You are capturing not creating the moment.

Some examples

For a large choir in a good sounding church singing renaissance music I might use a pair of omnis somewhere between 30cm and 60cm apart at least 2 meters off the ground and about 8 meters from the choir. If the room sound is not so great I might try an X/Y configuration with two coincident cardioids at an angle of 120º. This will give you a bit less of the back wall reflection and emphasise the direct sound more.

For a jazz quintet of sax, trumpet, piano, bass and drums I would start with my M&S pair and consider a spot mic for the drums particularly if the drummer is a subtle player (they do exist). To deal with any other balance issues I would try physically moving the players first and only then introduce spot mics. I wouldn’t do this for the horns and for solos they can step closer to the main mic pair. Most jazz quintets are pretty good at balancing their own sound for rhythm section solos.

Have a go

As with most things there is no substitute for experience. If you’re interested in this kind of thing see if there is anyone you could record. School bands, choirs and even local jazz ensembles are often willing to give something a go for a free recording. Perhaps you can get them to cover the cost of renting some mics or see what you can borrow. If you’re giving your time to a community group people will sometimes chip in with help.

If at all possible try a few different mic setups at the session to see what you like best. If the first thing you try sounds good still go on to try some other setups. Perhaps they will be even better and having those recording to compare will stand you in great stead as you move forward.

The image 44-A Side by Roadside Guitars is used under a Creative Commons License

Posted in Music Production | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Being a professional indie musician isn’t for everyone: Lessons from Charles Ives and Shellac

Charles Ives, 1913

Charles Ives was a very good insurance agent but he was also one of the finest American composers. His work is extraordinary and he created almost all his wonderful music while holding down a full-time job.

If you’re trying to make even a partial living as an indie musician you’re a businessperson, and the news gets worse… You’re a small business. That’s a tough row to hoe as it’s unlikely you’ll have much support. You’re going to have to fill lots of roles all by yourself, publicist, customer relations, sales, accounts and legal for starters. That’s all you. If you know a bit about any of those roles that’s great. If not get studying.

Talent and even producing wonderful music is only a component of success. There are lots of talented people and as a consumer it feels like there’s lots of music out there to listen to and quite a lot of it is really good. The way to garner an audience is to be good at publicising yourself and managing your relationship with your audience. The way to prosper (or at least survive) financially is to be good at selling stuff and managing the money that earns you.

This isn’t for everyone, but just because your music might not be your job doesn’t devalue your music at all. It might even be the best path you could take. You might be better off keeping your music as a hobby in the sense of something done for pleasure rather than for financial compensation. This can be a great liberation. Music doesn’t have to be your career, and choosing to make your living elsewhere doesn’t make your music any worse. In fact it could make it better.

Upsides to not making a living from your music:

  • Freedom to create whatever you want
  • No worries about pleasing anyone else
  • No stress about sales and income

Downsides to not making a living from your music:

  • Music becomes your second job
  • Time and energy may be hard to find
  • Difficult to be taken seriously as a musician

There are two interesting and very different examples of musicians who have taken this path in Charles Ives and Shellac. Read More »

Posted in Music Business | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments
  • Follow me on Twitter

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales
This work by rubken.net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales.