Recreating my musical self with the aid of (community) gravity and other invisible forces

Comet Donati by Bond 1858
Image of the Comet Donati taken by W. C. Bond in 1858. The comet leaves its trail as it passes on its elliptical path through the solar system. Periodic activity can feel like long-period comets but perhaps not everything needs to follow such a long orbit.
I have had a somewhat unsettled relationship with making music for a long time. It has always been a passionate one, but it has often been difficult to the point of not being an active musician for many years at a time. I always seem to return though and I’m going through that process again now.

Perhaps because I’m a bit older and more self-reflective, if not wiser, I find myself watching this process as it is occurring and trying to make sense of it. When I was younger it didn’t need to make sense, it just happened, but perhaps I’m not as trusting or brave as I was then.

I have been prodded out of my comfortable isolated process by an inter­esting, intimate and intro­spective article by Clutch Daisy. Where’s Your Head At? looks at the effect of an increasing level of self-awareness in his creative process. (That’s my take on it anyway and I hope it’s at least partially accurate)

Clutch’s article has resonated with me because my current musical state is redolent with self-awareness. I haven’t made much music for ten years and the process of restarting is not an easy one in many ways. Simply justi­fying using the time is no simple thing as I could be spending that with my family or looking to fill it with more remuner­ative work.

In so many places heightened self-awareness inhibits action. Like a teenage boy in a new lumbering graceless body I’m contem­plating the dance-floor and wondering how I’ll move. With my inter­rupted musical life it is simply a fact that needs to be dealt with though so I’m trying to incor­porate the meta-process into the process somehow. Continue reading Recreating my musical self with the aid of (community) gravity and other invisible forces

Hemmed in by signposts: Metaphors limit the scope of social media innovation

Long exposure of car tail lights
It can all become a blur very quickly

Metaphors are a crucial part of how we relate to the digital world. They are crucial in one sense as the low-level languages that computers use are incom­pre­hensible to humans. All our spangly, shiny Powerpoint present­a­tions and music libraries are streams of hexidecimal or binary digits to our processors and disk drives. Unless you’re very special these low-level digital streams are gobbledygook and even if you are special enough to make sense of them they’re certainly not anything like the files most of us expect to see or listen to.

With the invention of the graphical user interface (GUI) metaphor became a much more explicit part of our computing exper­ience. A host of analogies were launched upon us in a rush, windows, scrolling, dragging, trash and even document. These terms were needed to help us cope with this new world and GUIs were crucial in the spread of computing from the lab to the wider world.

While these metaphors were initially liber­ating they have become limiting partic­u­larly as digital inform­ation weaves itself into increas­ingly intricate patterns in our lives. Venkatesh Rao from the Xerox Innovation Group has written an inter­esting post on Mashable on this issue, specifically how the metaphors that served us well in the past now limit us. Continue reading Hemmed in by signposts: Metaphors limit the scope of social media innov­ation

Give Twitter a go: It’s quite good really

ugly chick
Not all birds are pretty

From within the bubble of Twitter enthu­siasm the worth of the platform seems self-evident, but there are people out there who aren’t convinced, don’t see the point of the medium and aren’t sure how to approach it. Twitter is a powerful tool and that power is the flexib­ility contained within the broadcast of 140 characters.

The premise is incredibly simple, but there are many ways to use the platform. DoshDosh has a pretty decent list of 17 ways to use Twitter. Interestingly, commu­nic­ating with people you know isn’t on that list. This is the way that Andrew Dubber uses it and he explains how he keeps in touch with his personal tribe on Twitter.

Both these posts leave out, at least largely, my favourite benefit of being on Twitter, listening. There are lots of inter­esting people on Twitter who are leaders in their fields and being inter­esting people they tend to have inter­esting things to say either directly through Twitter or posting links to their work or just what they are reading.

Twitter is also highly flexible. You can follow people but you can also follow topics through keyword searches. You can even do this persist­ently through using third-party client programs like Tweetdeck or Seesmic. I love this method because it removes the emphasis on the person­ality and the rise of the Twitter Star is a stumbling block at the moment. There are lots of people out there clamouring for attention.

The rise of the marketers and the popularity game

There are two big problems with Twitter at the moment for me. The first is the number of people marketing on the platform. There are lots of profiles of folks pushing out affiliate links, links to coupon sites or even links to sites selling courses on how to use Twitter to become rich beyond avarice. It is fine to ignore these people. They’re not really inter­ested in you they are following you in the hope that you’ll follow them back. Which brings us to the other part of the problem.

The second problem is that it is hard to resist seeing Twitter as a hierarchy or even a game. The currency of this game is, usually, followers. How many people listen to what you have to say. There are celebrities using Twitter with several million followers and perhaps more inter­est­ingly there are people whose field of expertise is using Twitter (and other social networks) who have hundreds of thousands of followers.

It is all too easy to feel inadequate with a measly hundred, twenty or five followers, but it’s not the size that matters (insert fnar-fnar joke here, after this meta fnar-fnar one). There are lots of ways to use Twitter. It is useful to stay focused on why you are using it though so as not to be sucked in by the gravity of convention.

Keeping your head above the stream

The primary metaphor of Twitter is that it presents you with streams of inform­ation. I think this is a useful metaphor as the inform­ation that passes through Twitter is ephemeral and in suffi­cient quantity it can feel like you’re drowning.

You don’t have to read everything. It’s OK to hop in and out. These aren’t messages targeted at you personally so no-one will be offended if you don’t remember what they tweeted about odd socks last Tuesday. If you start following a lot of people you probably won’t be able to read everything.

Andrew Dubber keeps in touch with about 150 people most of whom he knows personally. I’m not as social as him so I do use Twitter to keep in touch with a few people I know who use the platform, but mostly I use it to learn by following some brilliant people who tweet. In order to keep myself sane I have created lists of people by category, music, webdesign, science, Devon, etc. I can dip into these streams any time to see what the web folks are up to for instance. It’s a bit like wandering from group to group at a party.

I also have one main list that I pay particular attention to. This is fairly dynamic, I move people on and off frequently depending on what I’m most inter­ested in at the time. This list usually has about 30 people on it and almost never more than 50. There is a limit to how many people you can really pay attention too.

In a comment to his post Andrew Dubber mentions Dunbar’s number which is a theor­etical limit to the number of people you can maintain stable social relation­ships with. There’s no precise number but it’s commonly around 150 people. That’s how many he follows.

Why I would like you to use Twitter

The wonder of Twitter for me are brilliant, inter­esting and provoc­ative people who share 140 character slices of their thoughts. Like the internet in general, there is a wave of commercial interest in the platform. People are trying to figure out how to make money out of the medium. There are lots of business uses, customer service is one of the best, but Twitter’s currency is the individuals who use it.

Twitter’s interest is directly propor­tional to the number of people who use it. The more folks out there the better chance everyone has of building a community to listen to that fulfils them in some way. There are lots of inter­esting folks here already but there’s room for more.

The ugly bird catches no worm by Hinderik de Keijzer is used under a Creative Commons License